Testimonials
TESTIMONIALS FROM JUDGES
The European Moot Court Competition brings together top law students from around Europe to debate important issues of international human rights law in the Palace of Justice in Strasbourg, the home of the European Court of Human Rights. I had the privilege of chairing the Jury in the Grand Finals in 2015 and it was a great honour and a pleasure. I was struck by the immense ability and dedication of the participants and their passion for the issues that were debated. It is a comfort to know that new generations of competent lawyers are interested in pursuing a career in the field of human rights as this is a precondition for the effective protection and implementation of fundamental rights and freedoms. The Moot Court is a valuable experience for all those law students that are interested in furthering their careers in this field.
Róbert Ragnar Spanó
President of the European Court of Human Rights
It was a considerable honour for me to preside the 2016 Fourth Edition of the ELSA European Human Rights Moot Court in Strasbourg. Over the years this competition has acquired a high reputation and much prestige.(...)I have enormous admiration for all participants who over many months thoroughly prepared for this big event. They have gained so much in so many respects: a deep knowledge of European human rights and its procedures; how to plead in court both as an applicant and as a respondent; and not least how to cooperate as a team.
Mark Villiger
Former Judge and Section President at the European Court of Human Rights
TESTIMONIALS FROM PARTICIPANTS

They say you should always expect the unexpected. I suppose that’s true, though I’ve found that even when you tell yourself that, the unexpected still arrives with a certain jolt. When we won the Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition, the feeling wasn’t one of triumph exactly. It was quieter than that - something like gratitude, mixed with disbelief, and the weight of everything that had led us there. People say teamwork makes the dream work - it’s the kind of phrase you see printed on mugs or lanyards. But in our case, it was also true. The best parts of our arguments weren’t individual discoveries - they were born out of collective friction. Out of asking hard questions and not settling for easy answers. We didn’t want to get our hopes up. And still, when the quarterfinalists were announced, I zoned out after fifth place, assuming we hadn’t made it. Hearing our name in third felt like catching something that had already passed you. After that, it was different. Not easier, but steadier. With each round, our confidence grew - not in ourselves, exactly, but in each other. That trust, that camaraderie, is what carried us. Yes, we won. And yes, I am proud. But that’s not the only thing I carry from Helga. What I carry most is the sense of what it means to build something - an argument, a case, a team - with care, with patience, with the knowledge that law, at its best, is a shared pursuit. What I also carry is gratitude. For my teammates, for our coach, for the late nights and long rides, for every moment we doubted ourselves but didn’t give up. And for the chance to be reminded that the law can still feel alive. Not just doctrine and precedent - but something human. Something worthwhile.
Team 63 from Charles University, Czech Republic
Winners of the 13th Edition of the Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition

Participating in this year’s edition to represent our university (IE University) was an absolute privilege and an incredible experience that we will definitely never forget. Our goal was to push our legal knowledge to the limits and really dive deep into a Human Rights case to develop our advocacy skills, but soon, we realised that the Competition is about much more than just this. Apart from the substance, we also learnt to work hand in hand and to support each other to be able to showcase the best version of ourselves. Teamwork was a key ingredient in our success, and the bond we formed with each other and with our coaches was one of the most rewarding aspects of the experience. We found ourselves comfortable navigating through the case law of the Court, deepening our legal understanding, and gaining confidence in public speaking. This Competition has tested our knowledge, but has also pushed us to develop our legal reasoning and resilience in a way no classroom ever could. We cannot stress how much we have learnt during this competition. Being able to plead the case before Supreme Court judges, state lawyers, ECtHR judges, lawyers of the Court and many more professionals was priceless. This atmosphere encouraged us to perform our best and allowed us to learn from the judges and the teams around us between rounds.
Team 43 from IE University, Spain
Runner-Up Team of the 13th Edition of the Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition

Although the Award for the Best Orator in the Grand Final is nominally an individual honour, it is by no means an individual achievement. Partly, it is obviously awarded for how things are said, and I am willing to take some personal credit for that. However, the Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition is not a contest in sophistry - it is a legal competition where substance matters just as much as rhetorical skills. When it comes to the substance of my pleading, both in the Grand Final and throughout the competition, I cannot claim much individual credit for it. The arguments presented were shaped through countless hours of team preparation, which were always intense and inspiring, sometimes slightly frustrating, nevertheless, always enjoyable thanks to the great camaraderie that we managed to build as a team. This camaraderie was, I believe, the most important ingredient to our success, and what is even more important, it made the entire journey truly enjoyable. So, while my name may be on the Award, it truly belongs to the entire team and to our wonderful team coach. Nevertheless, the Award for the Best Orator is not the most valuable thing that I am taking away from the Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition. What I am truly grateful for is the inspiration it has given me for my future legal endeavours. To anyone thinking of participating in future editions of Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition – or any moot court - I cannot recommend it enough.
Matěj Plewa
Best Orator of the Grand Final of the 13th edition of the Helga Pedersen Moot Court Competition